Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Peter Gojowczyk vs Yanki Erel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gojowczyk vs Erel analysis and find out who is favored!
Peter Gojowczyk vs Yanki Erel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gojowczyk has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Erel has won 50.31%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gojowczyk, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Erel has won 55.73%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.43% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gojowczyk has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Erel has saved 56.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gojowczyk has won 58.82% of matches played (W/L 20/ 14), with Erel winning 61.19% (W/L 41/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gojowczyk has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 207/ 147), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 113/ 128). Erel has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 25/ 11), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Gojowczyk has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.61% of matches (W/L 20/ 13), where as Erel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.18% of matches (W/L 30/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gojowczyk winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Gojowczyk winning 2 and Erel winning 1. The last match between Gojowczyk and Erel was at the Bratislava 2 Challenger, 08-10-2023, Q1 round, I.hard with Peter Gojowczyk getting the victory 4-6 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:19.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gojowczyk and Erel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gojowczyk winning 1 times and Erel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gojowczyk winning 0, and Erel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gojowczyk has played against opponents with an average rank of 329.24 while Erel has played against players with an average rank of 192.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gojowczyk has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Erel has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gojowczyk has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Erel has converted 42.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gojowczyk 1 - 0 Erel
456
Rank
39
High
34
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
402
Rank
325
High
23
Age
L
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
55% (532-441)
Career Total W/L
60% (160-106)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
58% (15-11)
$1,837,855
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Peter Gojowczyk | Yanki Erel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:19 | 1:29:19 |
| 1st Serve % | 56% (37/66) | 65% (53/81) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (30/37) | 57% (30/53) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 59% (17/29) | 43% (12/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (6/15) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (39/81) | 29% (19/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Yanki Erel
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Peter Gojowczyk | Yanki Erel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (15/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (34/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (302/265) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (11/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 81 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 76 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:33:29 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 245.88 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 62% (1059/1712) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (738/1059) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (327/653) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 40% (72/178) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (709/1746) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 69% (9/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (15/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 76% (17/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 24% (17/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Peter Gojowczyk Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
48%
(
41 of
86)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
11
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
35 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kalin Ivanovski
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
9
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Akira Santillan
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Yanki Erel
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
29%
(
19 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
109)
17
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
109)
109
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Alexander Cozbinov
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
52%
(
46 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
5
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
92
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
Alexandre Aubriot
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
88)
9
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
17 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Peter Gojowczyk
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
10
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Yanki Erel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Altug Celikbilek
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Yanki Erel
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
2
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
5
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
30 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Fajing Sun
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Yanki Erel
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luke Saville
Player
Yanki Erel
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
9
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Uisung Park
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Sweeny
Player
Yanki Erel
57%
(
53 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
74 of
122)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
37 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
122)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Mikalai Haliak
50%
(
18 of
36)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
53
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Jie Cui
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Erik Arutiunian
Player
Yanki Erel
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
11
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gojowczyk Vs Erel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Yanki Erel
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
